I don’t want to say that I intend on this update to be the balance to yesterday’s entry. I thought that yesterday’s message was pretty clear. However, Murphy’s Law of preaching, teaching, etc., is that if a statement can be misinterpreted, it will be. Lest I sound like I was bashing people who desire to be married, I wanted to give my view of marriage that has sprung very much from the viewpoint I submitted yesterday.
As I was driving home from work today, I was admiring the green fields, blue sky, clouds, sunset, all while singing some songs of praise to God. Oh, how I was delighting in the glory of God! As I looked out the right side of my car at the beautiful scene before me, to the south, my eyes fell on the empty passenger seat.
At that moment, my thought was, I wish my wife was sitting there, enjoying all this with me. I thought how positively wonderful it would be for both of us, together, to delight in God. I wanted someone with whom could be shared a mutually delirious happiness in God and each other.
I am not against finding joy and happiness in marriage, nor am I against looking forward to it with great anticipation and longing. If the thought in your mind from yesterday’s update was that I was somehow saying that we should love God and not marriage, I want to lay that thought to rest. The point of yesterday’s message is that we should love God above everything in our lives and be willing to do without any of them in order to have Him, if He so chooses. And I was lamenting that I see so many of my friends who somehow view marriage as an essential component of their happiness that they delight in it more than they delight in God.
So tonight, I wish to say that in regards to the gift of marriage, I am positively, absolutely, 100% in favor of having and nurturing desires for marriage. God created it, and it is very good. God created woman because it is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him. (Genesis 2:18)
Marriage is a shadow, a picture of Christ and the church. Therefore to experience marriage is to personally experience, in a real physical setting, what that relationship is like. It is not the reality (hence yesterday’s update), and so if we do not have the shadow, it is no statement of our full participation in the reality being foreshadowed. But the shadow is very good.
But it’s a different longing than I used to have. I want to enjoy God with her. I want to love her in Christ. I want to see Christ in her. I want to be Christ to her, that is, show her the love of Christ. I want to build her up in Christ. I want to nourish and cherish her, as Christ does to the church.
I used to just want to enjoy her company. I still do, badly at times. But now, when the day comes that she looks at me, I want her to see me pointing, and as her eyes follow my pointing, she sees Christ in His glory. Then, our breaths will be taken away, and I’ll whisper, Isn’t He amazing? There is only so much beauty that I possess, and it wasn’t meant to satisfy like Christ. I want to pursue God together with her.
Is this making any sense? Marriage is, to me, perhaps the most intimate example of what John mentioned, in making his joy full. It’s the coming together of two people, who become one. They are united. And in so doing, their complete joy is entirely dependent upon the other’s complete joy. It is circular. My joy is made full when her joy is made full, and her joy is made full when my joy is made full.
Edwards said:
In some sense the most benevolent, generous person in the world seeks his own happiness in doing good to others, because he places his happiness in their good. His mind is so enlarged as to take them, as it were, into himself. Thus when they are happy, he feels it; he partakes with them, and is happy in their happiness. This is so far from being inconsistent with the freeness of beneficence, that, on the contrary, free benevolence and kindness consists in it.
If you got caught up, as I did, in the statement, the freeness of beneficence, in today’s language he means the idea that love is freely given without expecting anything in return. But he says that the most loving person is receiving something in return; namely, his joy.
In marriage, that’s exactly what’s happening. It’s two people who have enlarged their scope of joy from merely themselves, and have taken the other into his or her self. And so, I can’t be happy if my wife is not happy. If I seek to be happy at the expense of her happiness, I am not loving.
And so what satisfies us and makes us most happy? God. And so the great desire of my heart since reading The Pleasures of God in February of ‘02 was to have the intimacy of marriage in order that I might experience God in my wife, and she through me. It goes way beyond taking romantic walks on the beach (which I want to do!) and having picnics in the park (which I want to do!) and curling up in front of the fire on a cold night (which I want to do!) and a host of other intense pleasures that marriage brings.
Here’s an analogy. The other day, I received a gift from a long-distance friend. It was a thank-you note for some work I had done, and along with it was a Starbucks gift card. When I opened the the envelope, the gift card fell out. I picked it up, smiled, then set it aside so that I might read the note. The note was more valuable to me than the gift card.
Now, suppose I opened the envelope and out fell the card, and I looked at it and said, Wahooooooo! and ran out to spend it, not even reading the note. What would that say about my opinion of the note? Even worse, what would that say about my opinion of the giver?
The gift card represents God’s gift. It can be marriage. It can be food. It can be internet surfing. It can be reading. It can be music. It can be art. It can be video games. It can be nature. It can be good grades. It can be friends. It can be family.
The note represents the Word. In it are all the promises of God that are made good because of Christ. And the giver obviously represents God, whose fellowship is so incredibly sweet.
When God gives us His gifts, they are meant to be enjoyed. My gift card was given to me in order that I might benefit from the lattés I’m going to buy with it. I love coffee, and I love Starbucks. So when I go to Starbucks, I’m going to like drinking the coffee I can now buy because of the gift card. But when I do buy it, the giver is going to come to mind, and my heart will be filled with gratitude.
The giver is more important than the card. God is more important than all His gifts.
If I lost the card, or it was stolen from me, or it was damaged, would that affect my joy in my friendship with the giver? No, not in the least. Will I be disappointed in the missed coffee? Yes. But my delight in the giver would not be diminished. Every time I would think of my lost card, my mind would then focus on the giver, and I would think how nice it was to receive such a gift.
When His gifts are taken from us, threatened, damaged, whatever, should that affect our joy in our relationship with God? No, it shouldn’t. Will we be disappointed in the missed gift? Yes, and many tears may perhaps flow. But our delight in the giver should not be diminished, only strengthened. The Lord gives and the Lord takes away, blessed be the name of the Lord. (Job 1:21)
Now let’s say I am given the gift, but I just let it sit there and don’t go out and buy coffee. I am missing out on the joy the giver meant for me to have. Starbucks coffee is good! It is delightful! My irish cream latté is going to taste so good tomorrow morning! The fact that I can enjoy and savor the gift actually reflects my primary delight in the friendship of the giver.
You see, in both examples, the gift is passionately enjoyed. However, one dishonors the giver, the other expresses delight in the giver. The giver is glorified.
So it is with marriage. I am going to enjoy marriage if God grants it to me, and I want marriage so that I might experience the Giver more, not just by myself, but with her, and with the children He might give us. And if God wants me to experience Him more without marriage, that is totally worth it.
On the one hand, I look forward to it with an anxious longing; on the other, I could take it or leave it. An interesting set of emotions, huh?
I want to close with what Sarah Edwards told her daughter when her gift, Jonathan Edwards, died:
My very dear child!
What shall I say? A holy and good God has covered us with a dark cloud. O that we may kiss the rod, and lay our hands on our mouths! The Lord has done it. He has made me adore His goodness, that we had him so long. But my God lives; and He has my heart. O what a legacy my husband, and your father, has left us! We are all given to God; and there I am, and love to be.
Your affectionate mother,
Sarah Edwards.
This weekend I want to go over some of Packer’s Knowing God, the book where I got yesterday’s quote from. That chapter explains very much why grace means everything to me, and I feel that in my very guts. Until then, I hope I’ve clarified some misconceptions.

