<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>robhulson.com</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.robhulson.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:,2008-04-10:/2</id>
    <updated>2008-06-18T16:48:25Z</updated>
    <subtitle>pursuing well-formed opinions</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Personal 4.1</generator>

<entry>
    <title>A succession of presidents?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/06/ill-continue-wi.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.312</id>

    <published>2008-06-18T16:43:47Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-18T16:48:25Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Manward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'll continue with the Edwards sermon soon. I read this a few moments ago and laughed to myself.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Sen. Barack Obama, the Democrats' presumptive presidential nominee, rejected lifting the drilling moratorium that has been supported <strong>by a succession of presidents for nearly two decades.</strong> <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080618/ap_on_bi_ge/offshore_oil">Bush to Congress: Embrace energy exploration now</a></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Let's see... it was 1994, I believe, when this moratorium was decided upon. The president then was Bill Clinton. The only other president we've had has been George W. Bush. And he is now removing his support for the moratorium.</p>

<p>It just made me chuckle that the article makes it sound like a "succession of presidents for nearly two decades" is any more than <em>one</em> president who resolutely supported it.</p>

<p>Anyway. On to bigger and more important things.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How to Obtain the Blessing of God: Part 1</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/how-to-obtain-t-1.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.311</id>

    <published>2008-05-29T15:54:42Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-29T15:57:30Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Before getting into point #1, it would be well for us to examine what Edwards said just before his list of why God has ordained that He bless us through our not letting go of Him until He does so. I found this to be encouraging and beautiful. All these quotes are taken from <a href="http://product.half.ebay.com/_W0QQprZ2853778QQcpidZ1169229586">The Blessing of God: Previously Unpublished Sermons of Jonathan Edwards</a>, Broadman &amp; Holman, 2003, pp. 22-23.</p>

<p>As I told my small group on Tuesday night, I used to picture this whole scene with Jacob and God wrestling as if God were some cloudy, shadowy, ninja-like character appearing out of nowhere and wrestling with Jacob. Of course we all know that if indeed He <em>was</em> a ninja, he wouldn't be able to be seen. Even so, it's always seemed odd to me that Jacob, in the middle of wrestling with this Being... asks to be blessed? Edwards speculates that it was more like <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?q=Luke+24%3A13-35">the disciples on the road to Emmaus</a>, where Jesus appeared to them and was so pleasing in His fellowship that they didn't want Him to leave. I like this interpretation and it seems to answer to me why, when a person whose fellowship was so amazing as this was about to leave, Jacob didn't want Him to and argued and wrestled with Him in order to get Him to stay. And the only way he'd let Him go is if He promised to bless him. Edwards compares this to <em>prayer</em> and the way we intercede with God for the blessings we desire.</p>

<p>So why has God ordained that we receive the blessings we seek of Him through a process of "wrestling" with Him through persistent prayer? Edwards tells us,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>'Tis not that God needs it to make him willing to bestow the blessing. Or that the will of God is properly overcome by men's importunity.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>In other words, God doesn't need the desire of people to be blessed that makes Him desirous to bless them. It's not like we have to wear Him out by making Him so uncomfortable with our whining that He finally does the thing we ask, like a child who complains often and loudly enough to a parent before they begrudgingly give in to the child's demands. </p>

<blockquote>
  <p>God did not need Jacob's wrestling with him in order to make him willing to bless him. God was willing before and came to him with that design to bless him.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The blessing didn't come out of nowhere, as if it dawned on God that this was a good idea. "Oh yeah, what a great idea, Jacob! Blessing you, yeah, I think I'll do that." He came to Jacob with the intention of blessing him, and entered into this "wrestling match" in order to bless him.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>God is willing to bless his people, and this is the reason he stirs them up to wrestle with him for a blessing. When God seems to delay and to give repulses to what they seek, 'tis not that he is unwilling, 'tis not because he is backward. He is all the while exceeding ready, for God delights to bestow his blessing as much more than man delights to have him. And therefore they don't tire him out, though the part be much the same as 'tis with men when they are tired out with importunity and so are represented by it in Christ's parables.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I love that section. God delights to bless His people more than they even desire to be blessed. He is an inexhaustible fountain of blessing. If fallen, imperfect, evil human beings know how to give good gifts to their children, doesn't the perfect Heavenly Father know much more how to do so?</p>

<p>With that in mind, <em>why</em> do the whole wrestling thing? If God is so very willing to bless us even more than we desire to be blessed, why are we encouraged to labor in coming to Him over and over again? That seems odd. Edwards cites four reasons, and we'll tackle #1 right now.</p>

<p><strong>Reason #1: Because not letting God go except He bless us reveals the value and necessity of the blessing we seek.</strong></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>'Tis very suitable and becoming [appropriate, fitting] that before men have the blessing they should this way show their sense of their need of it and of the value of it. 'Tis very suitable that before God bestows his blessing upon them, persons should be sensible [personally aware] that they need it. And 'tis by their importunity and earnest seeking of it -- their not letting God go except he bestows it -- that they show their sense of their need of it.</p>
  
  <p>'Tis very suitable that before God bestows his blessing, persons should be sensible of the great value of the blessing and the advantage it will be to them. They show also a sense of this by their not letting God go except he bestows it.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The first reason that this is an appropriate method of receiving blessings, Edwards states, is because it shows to man the value of what he seeks. It reveals to him whether this is valuable or not. There are times where we ask for things from God that, if we really stopped and thought about it, aren't things we should have or might be detrimental to us if we received them.</p>

<p>Going to God over and over again shows us whether the thing we ask is truly valuable or not. When we find that it is, it puts us into an eager state to seek it from Him until He grants it. At some point, something that we more or less prayed for weak-heartedly becomes something that we've become zealous to receive.</p>

<p><em>God wants you to really want what you want</em>. You'll be much happier when you get what you strongly desire. Does that make sense? Through this process of wrestling with Him through persistent prayer, it makes us <em>want</em> the blessing more and, as we'll see in the next few steps, how this prepares us to receive the blessing we seek. Enough of Edwards for now, let's turn to what Jesus told us in Matthew 6:8.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>For your Father knows what you need before you ask him.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The question is, do <em>we?</em> Do <em>we</em> know what we need? By not immediately giving us everything we ask for, it gives us a chance to feel the weight of its value. Evidently, we're prone to lose heart when we pray because God doesn't normally answer immediately. This is why Jesus told the parable of the persistent widow in Luke 18.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>And he told them a parable to the effect that they ought <strong>always to pray and not lose heart.</strong></p>
</blockquote>

<p>I regularly lose heart in prayer for at least two reasons:</p>

<ol>
<li>I don't normally receive what I ask for very quickly</li>
<li>I don't really want what I'm seeking enough to keep asking Him for it</li>
</ol>

<p>I need a remedy, and Edwards has helped me. Listen to the story Jesus told in order to help us not lose heart in persistent, "Not-Letting-God-Go-Except-He-Bless-Us" prayer,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>In a certain city there was a judge who neither feared God nor respected man.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>So we have a godless, loveless man in a position of power and authority.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>And there was a widow in that city who kept coming to him and saying, 'Give me justice against my adversary.' For a while he refused....</p>
</blockquote>

<p>A widow (in that day widows were much more powerless than they are today) "kept coming to him" with a petition, and the wicked judge kept denying her. But she needed justice because of her opponent and knew that only this judge could grant it. She had a <em>need</em> and the answer to her petition was very valuable to her.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>But afterward he said to himself, 'Though I neither fear God nor respect man, yet because this widow keeps bothering me, I will give her justice, so that she will not beat me down by her continual coming.'</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The unrighteous judge granted her request because of her persistence. An unloving, selfish, and godless man may be worn out and overcome by persistent petitions. That's the way that <em>humans</em> can be. Jesus commented on His own parable with this:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Hear what the unrighteous judge says.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Read it again. Now. :o)</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>And will not God give justice to his elect, who cry to him day and night? Will he delay long over them?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The contrast is that God isn't unloving, selfish, nor godless, like the unrighteous judge. He loves His elect and hears their cries way more than a selfish judge hears the cry of a widow. If they keep crying to Him, will He delay <em>long</em> over them? It's important to note that He <em>does</em> delay, which is the whole point of this sermon from Edwards. God delays, but why? And here's the hopeful part: does He delay <em>long</em>?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I tell you, he will give justice to them speedily.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Wow. Speedily... after a delay.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Jesus' question makes me think that there's a way to pray <em>in faith</em> that receives what it asks for. Faith is the key, here. We know that because of Jesus' words in Matthew 21:22,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>And whatever you ask in prayer, you will receive, if you have faith.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>This is continually mentioned throughout the Gospels. My problem has been that I just didn't know what to do with these promises because God seems to delay when I ask Him for things.</p>

<p>Soooooooo, Edwards' first reason is that by delaying, we are given the chance to stop and think about the value of what we're asking, and see if we're really asking Him in faith for a very good thing.</p>

<p>I'm done for now. More to follow. I think I'll go pray.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How to Obtain the Blessing of God: Introduction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/how-to-obtain-t.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.310</id>

    <published>2008-05-26T16:19:13Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-26T16:25:19Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The following few posts will be about a sermon I read from <a href="http://product.half.ebay.com/_W0QQprZ2853778QQcpidZ1169229586">The Blessing of God: Previously Unpublished Sermons of Jonathan Edwards</a>. The sermon is entitled, <em>The Way to Obtain the Blessing of God is Not to Let God Go Except He Bless Us.</em> He based it on the account of Jacob's wrestling with God and asking for a blessing in Genesis 32:26-29,</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Then he said, "Let me go, for the day has broken." But Jacob said, "I will not let you go unless you bless me." And he said to him, "What is your name?" And he said, "Jacob." Then he said, "Your name shall no longer be called Jacob, but Israel, for you have striven with God and with men, and have prevailed." Then Jacob asked him, "Please tell me your name." But he said, "Why is it that you ask my name?" And there he blessed him.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>The bottom line message of the sermon is that <em>there is a persistency and fervor we should nurture and develop in seeking after God for the blessings we desire from Him, and He will grant them if we don't lose heart</em>. First and foremost, Edwards' concern is with the best blessing of all: the new birth. But he doesn't limit it to that, which is the part I'm trying to figure out in my life and theology. There's a very fine line between the promise of Psalm 1, "In everything he does, he prospers" and the idea that God always gives everything we want to us when we ask for it, and that suffering isn't to be a normal part of the Christian's life (John 16:33, 2 Timothy 3:12-13).</p>

<p>Whoever wrote this on the Wikipedia entry on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosperity_theology">Prosperity theology</a> said it well:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>While some proponents claim that [Prosperity theology's] ultimate purpose is the funding of evangelism and Christian charity throughout the world, critics argue that the teaching actually is a teaching of materialism masquerading as theology. Futhermore, it seems to promote more self-gratification than true spirituality.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>True enough, and there's no doubt in my mind that this happens. Even so, I still get back to 2 Corinthians 9:10-11, because it outlines the thing that the "critics" above argue against.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>He who supplies seed to the sower and bread for food will supply and multiply your seed for sowing and increase the harvest of your righteousness. You will be enriched in every way to be generous in every way, which through us will produce thanksgiving to God.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><em>That includes material blessings!</em> I find myself somewhere in the middle of this, feeling the pull in both directions. This doesn't mean I'm <em>balanced</em>; it means that I see the reasonableness of both positions and haven't chosen one or harmonized both satisfactorily in my mind. On the one hand, I know that God is the supreme treasure of my life and that even if He kills me, yet I will hope in Him (Job 13:15). On the other, I know that He is a God of immeasurable abundance and that He blesses us so that we may be a blessing to others, and that doesn't exclude material blessings!</p>

<p>Edwards' sermon has helped me get a better grip on walking this fine line. It must be walked, in my opinion, especially if you're an American Christian. You can't ignore either side of this equation and side with just one. There's tension, the tension that true Christians know all too well because we do not understand fully, only in part right now.</p>

<p>Therefore if you're interested in what Edwards has to say, I will give you an outline of what he says and labor over each point in the next four posts. It is proper, he says, that we obtain the blessing of God by not letting Him go until He blesses us because:</p>

<ol>
<li><p>it shows <em>to us</em> the value of the thing we're asking from Him. It makes us <em>sensibly aware</em> of the great benefit we will have if we receive what we're asking from Him,</p></li>
<li><p>it causes us to examine ourselves and see if there's anything in us that would give God a cause to deny us the blessing, thereby causing us to seek the blessing in a humble -- not demanding -- demeanor,</p></li>
<li><p>it makes us realize that only God can truly give us this blessing, that He is the source of it, and makes us all the more earnest in prayer and dependency on Him, and finally,</p></li>
<li><p>it shapes and fashions us so that when we receive it, we're in a right state to acknowledge <em>Him</em> to be the reason we've received it instead of solely our own ingenuity and not make a god out of the thing we've requested.</p></li>
</ol>

<p>I will begin with #1 within a few days.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>God isn&apos;t a math problem</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/god-isnt-a-math.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.309</id>

    <published>2008-05-23T13:44:59Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-23T14:07:31Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Could you describe your interest in God as <em>mathematical</em>? As in, God is an equation of some kind to be solved, and if He doesn't add up, you lose interest in Him?</p>

<p>For example, God is described as "love." God is described as "powerful." And yet bad things happen. Evil things happen. Just yesterday, for example, the five-year-old daughter of Steven Curtis Chapman as accidentally killed by her older brother in a freak car accident (<a href="http://www.cmt.com/news/news-in-brief/1587924/steven-curtis-chapmans-daughter-killed-in-suv-accident.jhtml">story</a>). How can a God who is described as loving and powerful allow such a heart-breaking thing to happen?</p>

<p>So we quest for some kind of solution to this mathematical conundrum. Something isn't "adding up" in this equation. We're driven to dismiss God altogether, put Him on the shelf for the time being, or look for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_theism">alternative explanations</a> to make the equation pan out.</p>

<p>But God isn't a math problem. He isn't a "problem" to be solved. He's a <em>Person</em> to be enjoyed and adored. Pastor John mentioned this as a key idea that gave him the desire to change from a professor at Bethel to a pastor at Bethlehem. This is what he said he learned about God from Romans 9.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I will not simply be analyzed, I will be adored. I will not simply be pondered, I will be proclaimed. My sovereignty is not simply to be scrutinized, it is to be heralded. It is not grist for the mill of controversy, it is gospel for sinners who know that their only hope is the sovereign triumph of God's grace over their rebellious will. (from <a href="http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/Sermons/ByDate/2002/110_The_Absolute_Sovereignty_of_God_What_Is_Romans_Nine_About/">The Absolute Sovereignty of God: What is Romans 9 Is All About?</a>)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>God is way bigger than something you're supposed to "solve." He's Someone who takes your breath away when you see a true glimpse of Him. His God-centeredness is a cause of wonder and mouth-stopping amazement. This is what Job said in Job 42:1-6 after he had been questioning how just it was for God to take away his health, wealth, and family:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Then Job answered the Lord and said:</p>
  
  <p>"I know that you can do all things,
  and that no purpose of yours can be thwarted.
   'Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?'
  Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand,
  things too wonderful for me, which I did not know.
  'Hear, and I will speak;
  I will question you, and you make it known to me.'
  I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear,
  but now my eye sees you;
  therefore I despise myself,
  and repent in dust and ashes."</p>
</blockquote>

<p>When we're granted the immeasurable blessing of having "eyes to see" the living God, in a mere moment all of our questions become moot. And this seeing can happen even today, not just after we die. We are being changed, as Paul said, from "one degree of glory to the next." We get access to these glimpses, according to the Bible, by <em>turning to the Lord.</em> To me, that involves turning <em>from</em> something so that I may turn <em>to</em> Him.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>But when one turns to the Lord, the veil [that blinds us from glory] is removed. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit. (2 Corinthians 3:16-18)</p>
</blockquote>

<p>So if you're struggling in trying to understand the infinitely high and unsearchable ways of God, start by turning back to Him and searching for Him with your whole heart. Trade your affections in other things for affections for Him. He has never disappointed me when I've sought Him in this way.</p>

<p>Speaking of, I owe you guys a post on that Edwards sermon I referenced before. It totally applies here. Putting that into Things.app as we speak.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>What wii did last night...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/what-wii-did-la.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.308</id>

    <published>2008-05-22T20:40:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-22T20:41:31Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Manward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last night, Rosanna and I went on a date consisting of us walking to our new little village (<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=saint+anthony,+mn&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=45.039817,-93.22261&amp;spn=0.005542,0.007296&amp;t=h&amp;z=17&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=45.038588,-93.223016&amp;panoid=5dK2x5ix_ZfJu7Op5jwXFw&amp;cbp=1,66.42726896432532,,0,-1.3213287457856053">take a little stroll if you wish, though the Google guys didn't go <em>through</em> it. Shame</a>). We had Pei Wei on the mind, but decided to look around at all the cool little places there.</p>

<p>It rocks. Guys, we've got a Pei Wei, Chipotle, Cold Stone, Cabina Italian Kitchen (basically the Italian version of Pei Wei), Caribou, clinics, GameStop, Wal-Mart, Cub Foods (big 24 hour grocery store for you non-Minnesotans), USBank, Culvers, Wendy's, Subway, TiresPlus, a dentist office, and more... all within easy walking distance of where we are. Unbelievable.</p>

<p>Wait, did I say GameStop?</p>

<p>Yes, yes I did. I told Rosanna before we went to dinner that I wanted to drop in and see what the current state of Wii supplies were. I'd been trying to get one since Christmas time with my birthday and Christmas moneys for sometime, growing weary of the "Do you have any Wiis today? No? Okay. Thanks." side of the conversation I'd been having for six months or so. I figured it'd behoove me to get to know some of the managers at such a convenient GameStop and see if I could get a head's up as to when a shipment was coming in.</p>

<p>It's not what you know, really. It's who you know. Anyway.</p>

<p>In we go, and the only people there is an assistant manager and an employee. Rosanna likes to make fun of the classic gamer type, y'know, the kind of person who lives vicariously through a video game character because he can't be successful in any other part of his life? I didn't ask her about it, but these guys impressed me as having a good head on their shoulders. At least the assistant store manager did, but that's probably because he's the kind of person that would make it to assistant store manager.</p>

<p>"Hey, guys. What can we do for you?" came the inquiry.</p>

<p>Bracing myself for the <em>I-hate-answering-this-question-500-times-a-day</em> attitude I'd been accustomed to receiving, I ventured another question.</p>

<p>"How's the Wii demand these days? Are they still selling out as soon as they cross the door?"</p>

<p>Imagine my surprise when the manager said, "They're still selling out quickly. But I think we've got one in the back."</p>

<p>IT'S MY LUCKY DAY!!!</p>

<p>"Bring that puppy out here," says I, and they do. A brand new Apple-inspired box of Nintendo's latest goodness.</p>

<p>"Oh, and we <em>just</em> got a used <strong>Mario Kart</strong> in the store, if you're interested." Now, this game <em>just</em> came out, and to get my hands on a used one was pretty cool. Save some money, get a game that you can play with other people? I think so.</p>

<p>Bottom line, we ended up with a) a Wii, b) Wii Play (with an extra Wiimote), c) an extra nun-chuck, d) Mario Kart Wii. Quite a start.</p>

<p>Rosanna wants this horse game, <a href="http://www.1up.com/do/gameOverview?cId=3161397">My Horse and Me</a>, and I'm gonna admit that I really don't care about the game, but I'm glad that Rosanna is finding an interest in such things. Thanks, Nintendo, for a game system that my wife and I can have fun with together!</p>

<p>We're also interested in <a href="http://www.ajc.com/unwrap/content/business/stories/2008/05/19/wiifit_0520.html">Wii Fit</a>. Big time.</p>

<p>So yeah. If you've got a Wii and you want to befriend us, or if you're up for some Mario Kart, please let us know. We'll be looking forward to leaving you in our dust trails soon.</p>

<p>And I enjoy playing games more now because I have <em>time</em> for them because I'm getting things done. w00t!</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Piper: What does &quot;God-centered&quot; mean?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/piper-what-does.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.307</id>

    <published>2008-05-21T14:42:53Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-21T14:51:56Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Links" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Manward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good post from John Piper, <a href="http://www.desiringgod.org/Blog/1234/">What Does 'God-Centered' Mean?</a></p>

<blockquote>
  <p>What we mean when we say God is "God-centered" is that he acts like that. He saves for the sake of his name. He saves to make known his own power.</p>
  
  <p>And what we mean when we say we are God-centered (or desire to be) is that we like to have it that way. It satisfies us to have God save us for God's sake. We are happy that this is the way it is. We get pleasure in seeing it and savoring it.</p>
  
  <p>We like to talk about God doing it that way.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>That's the heart of why I'm in Minneapolis and not still in Edmond, OK. It's why I'd move my new wife and myself to a city where I didn't know a soul. I wanted to be around a group of people who had this as their foundation, their overarching theme, and who put it <em>into practice</em>. How does one minister, preach, and love other people from this worldview?</p>

<p>It's what the book <a href="http://www.desiringgod.org/dg/id1.htm">Desiring God</a> is about. Thank you, Nathan Carr, for recommending we study this. And if you want to get into <em>my</em> head, there are few better places to go. Maybe <a href="http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/OnlineBooks/ByTitle/1729_Future_Grace_Sample/">Future Grace</a> would be better, I don't know. Thank you, Josh Williams, for giving this to me at Steve's Rib in January of '01. You have no idea just how much your generosity is multiplying a harvest of goodness in this world.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>GTD: Getting Things Done</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/gtd-getting-thi-1.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.306</id>

    <published>2008-05-16T14:15:18Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-16T14:17:58Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Links" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Manward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="gettingthingsdone" label="getting things done" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="gtd" label="gtd" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="organized" label="organized" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="things" label="things" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thingsapp" label="things.app" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>When you move, you come to grips with at least one thing:</p>

<p><em>Good gravy, but do I have a lot of stuff!</em></p>

<p>I came to that realization, and the last month or so has seen me growing in my attempts to get organized. I've taken several important steps. I'm going to share them. Maybe these will help you.</p>

<ul>
<li>I trimmed my email accounts down to a couple.</li>
</ul>

<p>This was the first big step for me. If you're like me, you've accumulated multiple email accounts over the last few years. Instead of hanging onto them sentimentally, I took my favorite ones and have a purpose for each. In one, I do my personal emails. In the other, I sign up for most of my web services through.</p>

<p>The only email accounts I have now use the IMAP protocol. If you don't know what that means, it's basically an email protocol that keeps all of your emails, folders, etc., in sync no matter where you're checking your email from. iPhone? No problem. Mail.app? It's all in sync. Webmail? I've got it. </p>

<p>Let's face it: Managing one email account is hard enough. Why manage multiple versions of one email account?</p>

<p>BTW, I'm using <a href="http://mail.google.com">Gmail</a> and <a href="http://www.apple.com/dotmac">.Mac</a>. </p>

<ul>
<li>Inbox Zero</li>
</ul>

<p>I was inspired several months ago in my post <a href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2007/08/email-bankruptc.html">Email Bankruptcy</a> to get a handle on what I needed to email. Little did I know that there was a whole system called <a href="http://www.43folders.com/izero">Inbox Zero</a> from Merlin Mann has influenced me a tremendous amount. The idea behind this is that every email that comes in carries with it five verbs I can perform on it immediately. I can 1) delete it, 2) delegate it, 3) respond to it, 4) defer it, or 5) do it. It's liberating when you decide that hey, I can handle these as they come in because I'm a responsible human being created in God's image to design and create the reality I will soon find myself in.</p>

<p>Gosh, I could write so much on this one. Alas, you don't have time to read it, so either read the link above or <a href="http://www.43folders.com/2007/07/25/merlins-inbox-zero-talk">watch the half-hour video (followed by a half hour of questions)</a>. Onto the next one!</p>

<ul>
<li>Consolidated my online presence</li>
</ul>

<p>This one was hard. I came to realize that my TIME, like my MONEY, is limited and I needed to budget it on what matters most to me. Right now, that involves a slight presence on Facebook, Twitter, and my blog. Occasional Crossings posts are okay. I won't join your Mob War, your vampire club, your brilliant quiz, or whatever. I just won't.</p>

<p>But man does it feel good to be able to give yourself to what you want! Twitter is perfect for me; it's simple, elegant, and gives me the bottom line very, very quickly. Speaking of...</p>

<ul>
<li>News feeds</li>
</ul>

<p>I'm a junkie for blogs and news and whatever. I realized that I was going to a bunch of websites to check for new information, and I didn't really care for Safari's implementation of RSS. <a href="http://reader.google.com">Google Reader</a> solved that for me: I could access my favorite information sites from one source that was accessible to me from any computer or my iPhone and not skip a beat. Instead of wasting one to three minutes just finding out what was new, I now had it all conveniently delivered to my feed reader. And I check it sparingly because I value my time.</p>

<p>More about RSS thanks to Abraham Piper, <a href="http://www.desiringgod.org/Blog/1208_what_is_rss_a_stepbystep_guide_to_google_reader/">What Is RSS? A Step-by-Step Guide to Google Reader</a></p>

<ul>
<li>Organized my desktop</li>
</ul>

<p>I also organized my whole user account on my Mac. I cleared EVERYTHING off of my desktop, <em>every single item including the Macintosh HD</em>, and got into a much better way of organizing. I'm following the principles of Inbox Zero and taking them to heart for my computer. When I download an application, put it into the applications folder <em>and delete the disk image immediately</em>. If I download a PDF, do I want this to stick around archived or should I delete it now? It's all about <em>action</em>.</p>

<p>A coworker (thanks, Dan!) showed off to me some great ways through an article called <a href="http://zenhabits.net/2007/11/how-to-get-things-done-on-your-mac/">How to Get Things Done on Your Mac</a>. Oh my has it been </p>

<ul>
<li>Getting Things Done</li>
</ul>

<p>There's a book out there called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Getting-Things-Done-Stress-Free-Productivity/dp/0142000280/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1210946970&amp;sr=8-1">Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity</a>. Many of the things I've mentioned have been based on the core principles found in this book. I'd highly recommend you consider finding out more about this. The easiest way to whet your appetite is through a Google speech the author did, <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4796033787900433945&amp;hl=en">David Allen: Getting Things Done</a>.</p>

<p>But I needed an application that understood what I was now trying to accomplish. Enter...</p>

<ul>
<li>Things.app</li>
</ul>

<p>This is a super-simplified application to help you get things done. I can't really explain it because I'm still learning all of this, but in the last few days I had been thinking, "Man, I need a way to organize all of this." I can't find anything better than <a href="http://www.culturedcode.com/things/">Things.app</a>. I <em>just</em> got it today and have been using the heck out of it already.</p>

<p>There's a start. Perhaps I'll talk more about some of these things in the future. But right now, I've got to get some things done....</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>BibleMap.org</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/biblemaporg.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.304</id>

    <published>2008-05-14T13:59:26Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-14T14:24:45Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Links" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This thing is awesome. I was reading 2 Samuel 2 today and thought how cool it would be to be able to see where all these events took place in a sort of Google Maps-like environment.</p>

<p>I don't know who these guys are, but I'm glad that we have it.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.biblemap.org">BibleMap.org</a>, basically a Google Map-powered site that allows you to pick a chapter of the Bible and any geographical reference is a link to a Google Map location.</p>

<p>Flippin' sweet.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>I want to be a fruity tree</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/i-want-to-be-a.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.303</id>

    <published>2008-05-08T17:59:47Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-08T17:59:47Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like this line from Goo Goo Dolls' <em>Stay With You</em>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Take what you need from me.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>That's what I'm aiming for in my life, to be a place where other people draw what they need from me.</p>

<p>See Psalm 1.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Edwards rocks</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/edwards-rocks-1.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.302</id>

    <published>2008-05-06T16:37:47Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-06T18:52:10Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've been reading Jonathan Edwards again. Dang, that bro was one smart guy. His sermon about obtaining the blessing of God is, well, earth-shattering in my view of God. It's so applicable in my life now.</p>

<p>Yes, I will post about it. It'll take a few posts to get through, but it will be worth it.</p>

<p>I hope that MovableType gets an iPhone app next month. I'd blog sooooo much more. It isn't easy to balance between this blog, Twitter, and Facebook. Maybe I'll find the right balance soon. Social networking can be tiresome!</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Passive or Empowered?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/05/passive-or-empo.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.300</id>

    <published>2008-05-02T15:26:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-02T15:26:55Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just because God is at work in you both to will and to work for His good pleasure doesn't mean you are passive in the Christian life; rather, you are <em>empowered</em>.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Unfortunate delay</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/04/unfortunate-del.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.299</id>

    <published>2008-04-27T19:37:02Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-27T19:46:40Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Site News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Somehow my planned big blog entry has been deleted along the way. I'm not sure where or how, but it's gone. This will simply mean that I've got an obstacle to overcome getting this thing out. It was pretty good, too.</p>

<p>I believe it's for the best, because I want to be able to say what I'm thinking accurately, fully, and clearly. It wasn't at that point when I left it last.</p>

<p>Didn't something like that happen to Coldplay with <em>X&amp;Y</em>? They pretty much started over from scratch? I don't remember exactly.</p>

<p>Anyway, keep the faith. I'll get it out. This week, we're moving. That means time will be a very valued commodity. I've written a few things over on <a href="http://www.liveloud.net/blog">LiveLoud</a>, the blog of my friend Doug Stuart. It's in the comments of his post, <a href="http://liveloud.net/blog/?p=169">Punished with a baby?!</a>.</p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A big one is coming....</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/04/a-big-one-is-co.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.298</id>

    <published>2008-04-23T16:33:53Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-23T16:34:34Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Site News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        Be prepared. A big entry I&apos;ve poured a lot of my heart into is forthcoming. Look for it over the next two or three days.
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Each must look not only to his own interests</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/04/each-must-look.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.297</id>

    <published>2008-04-18T13:41:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-18T14:12:50Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: Helvetica; line-height: 18px;"><div>From <a href="http://www.covenantseminary.edu/resource/Barrs_ChristianityAndTheArts.pdf">Christianity in the Arts</a> (thanks, <a href="http://www.desiringgod.org/Blog/1185_accept_truth_wherever_it_appears/">Desiring God</a>),<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal; "></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div></span></p><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">Repeatedly in the history of the Church, Christians have been tempted to devalue the richness of creation and therefore to devalue also the arts, as if it would be somehow more "spiritual" to live a life devoid of beauty, of good things, of music, of literature, of painting, of color, etc. It is as if bare simplicity, barrenness, and even ugliness were somehow considered to be more pleasing to God. Behind this idea is the conviction that it is only what is "spiritual" that matters, and that the physical, therefore, is only of secondary value at best. In this view, the arts are thought of as an optional, rather extravagant, and unnecessary extra in life. But this belief is nonsense, and is, according to Paul, a heresy of the most serious kind, for in the end it is a denial of the goodness of creation.</blockquote><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: Helvetica; line-height: 18px;"><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal; ">I would say, based on what I'm learning right now, that this includes not only the arts, but <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">capitalistic pursuits</span>. There have always been those in the Church who have been "fond of sordid gain" and have devoted themselves to pursuing money out of a great love for it. We must keep our lives free from the love of money and this requires hard work.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;">But corresponding to the above quote, there is an opinion lurking in many that <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">poverty, making enough to "get by," and making sure I don't make too much </span>are somehow more pleasing to God.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;">Paul in Philippians 2:4,</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div></span></p><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.</blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><br /></blockquote>Paul also in Ephesians 4:28,<p></p>
<div><br /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">Let the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with anyone in need.</blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><br /></blockquote>I'm coming to realize that making "just enough" money for yourself and/or your family is often a guise for <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">selfishness </span>and is little or no better than making lots of money and hoarding it. We think that because "I'm not making as much money as <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">that</span> guy who owns that SUV and a boat and a bigger house" that this somehow makes us more spiritual, content, and loving than he is. The amount of money you make is no necessary barometer of your spiritual state.<div><br /></div><div>What you do with the money you have is. How you think about the process of making money and meeting other people's needs is. How much time you spend on yourself and your own private pursuits, be they solitaire or snowboarding, is.</div><div><br /></div><div>There's more to life than merely meeting your own needs. You've got to get <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">outside</span> of yourself and give to others. And here's something I'm coming to see for Americans: it's okay to dream up and pursue just capitalistic schemes that result in large amounts of profit.</div><div><br /></div><div>It's what you do with the profit that matters. Are you rich toward yourself and not rich towards God and other people?</div>]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New ESV Study Bible</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.robhulson.com/archives/2008/04/new-esv-study-b.html" />
    <id>tag:www.robhulson.com,2008://2.296</id>

    <published>2008-04-17T13:27:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-17T13:48:03Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>rob</name>
        <uri>http://www.robhulson.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Godward" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Links" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.robhulson.com/">
        <![CDATA[I'm quite excited about the new <a href="http://www.esvstudybible.org/">ESV Study Bible</a> (thanks to Abraham @ <a href="http://www.desiringgod.org/Blog/1182_esv_study_bible_a_new_old_book/">Desiring God</a>) that is coming in October 2008.<div><br /></div><div>This reminds me of some of my frustrations when reading our current Bibles, especially the <a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?q=Exodus+36-40">last few chapters of Exodus</a>, and that is that there are beautiful descriptions of, say, the <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">temple</span>, but you have to perform too many mathematical equations to get anything imagined in your brain. (i.e., "If a cubit is approximately 17.5 inches, then<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: normal;">102</span> </span>cubits would probably be 150 feet, which is like half of a football field...") This new one has some awesome looking illustrations and maps, and that's good because sometimes I pull a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaston_%28Beauty_and_the_Beast%29">Gaston</a>. ("How can you read this? There's no pictures!") Not to mention the study notes look fantastic.</div><div><br /></div><div>And it'll come in that nifty TruTone® material?</div><div><br /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">The ESV Study Bible is the most important resource that has been given to the emerging generation of Bible students and teachers. The ESV Study Bible is the best. Period.</blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><br /></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">- Mark Driscoll</blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
